SOCIAL MEDIA

Sign up to follow this blog:

Sweet Goodness! You've Visited My Blog Over 1.2 Million Times and Counting! Thanks!

If you are looking to see how much your melmac is worth, you can read this post. I am sorry that I cannot answer all of your questions - but if you look hard enough on this blog, I think you will find most of your questions answered.
Saturday, July 10, 2021

Melmac Dinnerware Podcast

Finally, I'm doing a podcast on vintage living and in my first episode I touch on Melmac and melamine dinnerware by American Cyanamid.  It's a short segment but one I hope to talk to you about.  I haven't had much time to actually write here on my melamine dinnerware blog so I figured I would talk to you instead.  If you want to listen, you can click to listen to episodes right here on the blog, or go to 


BuzzSprout 

or Spotify here to listen.  

amazon music here


In the meantime happy collecting. 

Melmac Dinnerware


Friday, June 24, 2011

Vanished: Russel Wright Prototype pre Meladur Melmac Mug Where Did It Go and Why Did it Vanish?

Where Have I Gone?
This one from Syracuse University, has cracked with age....note the free flow handle into the rim.

Somewhere between March 1944 and 1946, came into existence a very rare melmac mug prototype (shown here in blue, above, and below.) This mug was designed by Russel Wright, and was set to be an accompanying piece in his original "test line" (originally marked Cyanamid Plastics, later named Meladur.) To understand the whole sordid saga, you must first understand this "test line" was designed by Russel Wright only to do research in restaurants and get consumer opinion wherein a huge survey was compiled and reported back to American Cyanamid. He did not have to design the line--as other melamine dishes existed in fact Edward Don and Company was one of the companies he was talking to to get crucial feedback.
Here it is! Marked Cyanamid Plastics, it was flat based, with stacking ridges.
The goal of the survey was an effort to get molders (more than 15 in the first year)* to mold dishes or dinnerware of melmac and melamine therein obtaining the powders from American Cyanamid. It's secondary goal was to gain consumer interest knowing that upper crust designer Russel Wright (whose American Modern had made it's way into tons of homes and housewives loved his style) was doing the survey.   The point here is, Wright's test line would later be produced by General American Transportation Company circa 1949 under the name Meladur.  When it went into production, the mug in question, all but disappeared--in fact, was replaced with a not-so-similar mug go with by General American. But why?
Redesigned Meladur Mug, Not even close! The handle is not flush with rim, no stacking ridges. Not Wright Designed.
FLUSH HANDLE DESIGN - CUPS AND MUGS

Flush-handle Cups.  Wright was known for these both in china and plastic.
What I'm talking about by a flush-handle is the way the handle "flows" right into the rim with basically "no" rim area present.  Although the FLAIR cup above has a bit of rim action, it gives the illusion of free form from other angles.    Top Left to Right: Blue-Meladur, Blue -Aussie Superware Duperite,  Bottom Row Left to Right : Orange: Flair by Russel Wright , Peachy Pink: Watertown Lifetime Ware, Yellow: Canadian.

Russel Wright's Residential Cups were Perfect Examples of Flush Handles, these @ RetroChalet.
**Bermuda Coral Free-Form Mug by Watertown, by QuietRainz.
WATERTOWN : FIRST TO THE FLUSH!

*It should be noted here, as per Christopher's research, that Watertown Manufacturing Company was "the first" manufacturer of the flush handled cup for residential use that we know of.  Christopher's research on Lifetime Ware has been extensive, and I must say--quite impressive.  Many people credit Russel Wright for being "first" melmac to the table, but sadly, that was just a fable started over time and not fact.

Back to the prototype mug in question, one known prototype exists in Syracuse, and some others in the personal collection of Mr. Melmac, obtained first hand from an American Cyanamid executive. But why and when did this cup disappear or stop being produced?  The mystery remains unsolved and the debacle continues.


Another shot of the one-in-Syracuse mug. Was it too simliar to it's Military counterparts below?



So we can date the original test pieces from 1945 to 1948.   In the original line, not only was a regular cup and saucer designed, but a small mug.  The mug had a free form handle that flowed into the rim such as these cups below.  It had a stacking ridge for drying purposes, and was not a large mug, but more of a upgraded coffee cup side, and of course, fit just fine in the well of the saucer. I guess the best way to describe it, was smaller than a regular mug, but larger than a coffee cup.  Odd, I suppose.


Possible explanation/s:

THEORY ONE: THE SIZING OF THE MUG WAS TOO SMALL.
The test mug was not as large as military mugs, and would have held maybe an ounce more if that than the coffee cup. So perhaps it was more European in sizing and perhaps American Cyanamid decided it wouldn't fare well in the USA.
 
THEORY TWO: COPYRIGHT (PATENT INFRINGEMENT) ISSUES.*

*Thanks to Christopher who pointed out this would have been a "patent issue."  We can look onto other melmac mugs and see some similarities in size, stacking ridges, but none have the exact shape of the free flowing handle. Many are close, but no two exact.
Military mugs (AngiesIris) are larger, different handle, not flush with rim but have the stacking ridges.
If copyright (*Patent Infringement) was the case, there are plenty of known examples where designs can be a bit different and not in infringement.  (Besides, I can't find any patents.)  So I find it hard to believe this was the case, but if so, why wasn't Wright's put into production? Even if Cyanamid thought it was too close to another manufacturer's existing style, why wouldn't Wright change it or redesign it slightly and put it into production later during the time Meladur was actually produced?  We can see "traces" of the original design everywhere we look.

Kysite of Maine, by Bitta Vintage.  Same shape handles and overall size.

My Austrailian Superware Duperite Set looks just like the real deal!
I bought these out of Canada, from ThriftFindDesign, they have free flowing handles and stacking ridges. Perhaps a predecessor of the Prototype Mug?
Dallas Ware Cups by AnnieGreenSprings hold many simliarities, size, ridges but still the handle is not free form into the rim.

These lovely orange cups by FunkDaughter are marked GPL of Canada.
GPL of Canada again by Cottagewear aka The Lakehouse.
Similiar design by Vanguard from Maplex of Canada available at StarlingMemory.
Harmony House Today mugs, same size, handle similar but not exact, missing ridges, now in the McPherson collection.


Many years ago, I found a patent search by HJ Stotter, which showed cups made of Stacking ridges almost identical to the prototype cups. Since these cups came much later, I did not think this could have been an issue.  I've also seen examples by Arrowhead, Boontonware, Cloverlane, and Halsey that are similar to the ones above.

THEORY THREE: THE CAT ATE IT.

Do you know why this mug vanished? Solve the Mystery!  Tell me! 

RELATED READING:

Read about the Test Line on the Meladur Page. 

Read about the first "flush form mug" and see Watertown at Plastic Living.

Special thanks to Christopher whose expertise keeps me in line.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011

For the Love of Beetleware, England, and the Conspiracy Theory

The London Beetleware Backstamp! These lovelies available at Palaver! 
In the 1930's Beetleware, a thin plastic type material was used for just about everything here in the States.  But just what was it?  Beetleware, was a division of American Cyanamid out of New York. The "urea formaldehyde powder" had actually "technically" originated in London (therein called Beatl, or Beetleware) circa 1925.

The Beetlware American backstamp.  You may just see the tiny "B" in the shield more often than not.

It's use here in the States should be credited to Christian A. Kurz, Jr. (of Kurz-Kasch Company, Dayton Ohio) who was traveling in England, and saw this in use. He was a custom molder here in the states, and it was he who convinced American Cyanamid to start the licensing, and import of it here.  If Kurz-Kasch sounds familiar, it's because they are still in business today and have a long industrial history here in the States!  Read how it came to be here, in Jeffrey's book.
Dish Samples from my collection. Note the one on far right has wood in it!
So it was that back in the late 1920's and early 30's London was using Beetleware everything.  Their designs were so mod and you'll see so many neat mustard pot and egg cups. Talk about upscale plastics - the Brits had some amazing stuff!  I especially want to mention they made a lot of mottled colors, the confetti type blues and greens, quite lovely.  Check out these pudding bowls to see how lovely and well made they were!


Gorgeous Pudding Bowls , $15.27 bargain priced at Palaver (price subject to current exchange rate)


Here in the States, circa 1933, just about any color of Beetlware was available! Note, no mottled or confetti colors in this ad! From Beetleware President's lips, a customer was happy with her lavender toilet screws!!!
A New Yorker ad from 1930 boasts about the "new Beetleware" having unbreakable cups, tumblers, and mugs. Some of the colors mottled and translucent.  By 1933, more bold brights were introduced.  Americans adored and embraced the bold colored picnic ware, knobs, electric components, travel trailer dishes, and premiums! Ahhhhh the premiums...it was boasted in a 1934 article by RS Childs, then Beetleware President that sales in 1933 of Beetleware mugs, tumblers, measuring spoons and PREMIUMS alone accounted for 16,000,000 pieces being made.  So how many pieces were really produced? Plastic was BIG! 
Post Grape and Nut Flakes Cereal Premium Bowl, with Mickey Mouse, $28 at TheFarmersWifeInIowa

This lovely premium features Orpan Annie, and is a steal at $6 from Carols Threads. 
Note how Beetlware states who is giving the premium, in this case Ovaltine! Photo: CarolsThreads

The rumors go that Melmac was introduced as a solution to the dissatisfaction of earlier picnic plastics, which would indicate that Beetlware could be a culprit of breaking, cracking, or snapping in half.I have to say the plates I have are very thin. Perhaps thin flimsiness wasn't appreciated in the long run, contrary to the 1930's claims of this super duper plastic being unbreakable, it certainly WAS.
 
United States Beetlware Dish Samples- Flimsy or not,  I love the Dishes!
MY MELMAC CONSPIRACY THEORY 
People laugh at my theory that MELMAC was just the new and improved Beetlware . It's my personal opinion from years in Marketing, that American Cyanamid was smart in many ways--seeing how well Beetleware's reception initially was, (arms wide open) but knowing they had to improve upon it they wanted an out. During this time, in 1937 melamine powder was very inexpensive and quite honestly, another plastic with some similar components as it's successor Beetlware.  Many will tell you I'm wrong, but I say to them, they were both urea formaldehyde plastics were they not? Beetleware was said to be Unbreakable in 1930 and Melmac unbreakable also were they not? Both were marketed and sold by American Cyanamid were they not?  YES THEY WERE! Recipe for Marketing Success: One cup Beetleware Powder, add some of this a pinch of that and voila, new and improved super duper plastic called Melamine, or Melmac if produced by American Cyanamid. Just my theory....you should know however both were produced by American Cyanamid over the years. In 1940's you could buy either Beetlware or Melamine!  MONOPOLY ANYONE?








If only the plastic can talk, this cup at RetroChalet.






LINKS YOU MAY LIKE:

Beetleware on Etsy
BBC Beetleware Powderpuff Dish

Read Excerpts in Jeffrey Miekle's Book

British Plastics Federation

View or Buy Bakelite and Plastics (Find Beetleware Here) From Vanished Eras.

See My 100+ Plastic Items  for sale!
Sources :
Plastics Products VOL10-11, 1934 Int,